Comparison of ultracopier, SuperCopier, TeraCopy and copyhandler
I wanted to compare my product to be full all copiers existing file. Take it for a more personal view, I therefore compared
ultracopier,
supercopier,
teracopy and
copyhandler
Here none of:
- Better than Teracopy
- Better than SuperCopier
- It's quick
- It's beautiful
- Only free software (no teracopy pro/full, only teracopy free)
I compare the real feature, and no-subjective value.
Ultracopier / Supercopier 4 
The benefits of Ultracopier overlooked other copiers in my opinion:
- Multi-plateform (linux, mac and windows)
- Written in C++ for all peaple can develop
- Lot of version (normal, 64Bits, portable, debug)
- Written in Qt to take advantage of this lib (translation, themes, css, plugin, ...)
- Try standardized a maximum of things and to share up to code, and to a maximum of lib internally and with other Copiers
- Increased vigilance for the safety of transferring data
- Very good roadmap and technical document or simplified, good community and very responsive developer (I have tools for high performance instant notification)
- Nice site tailor-made and a platform to create a great community
- Updated regularly, git version available for the latest version not yet released
Disadvantages:
- Faults in the site (we just not be good everywhere), English not very English
- Very few donations so I can not devote myself fully to ultracopier
- Some translations are done via Google Translator, but facilitated the translation system will have to change it
Supercopier 3
The benefits of SuperCopier Other copiers in my opinion:
- Longstanding
- Runs under wine if you throw the copies by hand
- Open source
Disadvantages:
- Written in Pascal, no developer can help
- Control missing (on config load, during the file copy)
Teracopy
The benefits of teracopy free overlooked other copiers in my opinion:
- Copy parameter adaptation according to the media source and destination
Disadvantages:
- Paying
- Few change
- No option to copy window
- Crash under windows 8 (bad bug/crash prevention)
- Only under windows
- Utility to manage the buffer size by the slider highlighted on the interface?
Copy handler
The benefits of copy handler overlooked other copiers in my opinion:
- Written in C + + for everyone to develop, but some specific to Windows and Visual Studio required
- Is efficient
- Small window ready systray that bit better suit some
Disadvantages:
- Only under Windows and had problems with new windows, but it's fixed
- Version enough sleep (was done mostly middle 2009), only maintained, no new version planned
- Interface fairly hot oven and useful information for developers who want to optimize
- There is no portable version
|
|
Ultracopier 1.0/Supercopier 4 |
Supercopier 3 |
Teracopy free 2.27 |
Copyhandler 1.32 |
Environment |
Windows |
|
|
|
|
Windows 8 |
|
|
4 |
|
64Bits version |
|
|
5 |
|
Mac |
|
|
|
|
Linux |
|
|
|
|
Mobile |
|
|
|
|
Version portable |
|
|
1 |
|
Totally Free |
|
|
|
|
Opensource |
|
|
|
|
Use catchcopy |
|
|
|
|
Interface |
Plugins |
|
|
|
|
Skins/Themes |
|
2 |
2 |
|
Mode detailled or simple |
|
|
|
|
Default action for colisions/errors |
|
|
|
|
Management for the copy list |
|
|
|
|
Limit the speed |
|
|
|
|
Rename rules |
|
|
|
|
Filters |
|
|
|
|
Options of copy avanced |
Add new file in copying |
|
|
|
|
Control space |
|
|
|
|
Version debug with report |
|
|
3 |
|
Keep first plan |
|
|
|
|
Keep the rights |
|
|
|
|
Copy engine options |
|
|
|
|
Choosing the copy engine |
|
|
|
|
Detection updated |
|
|
|
|
All the errors is checked |
|
|
|
|
Out of buffer don't do heavy seek |
|
|
|
|
Community |
News, site dedicated, forum, wiki |
|
|
|
|
Fast support |
|
|
|
|
Recent activity |
|
|
|
|
- Have bad support of mixed architechture, and no intercept the copy
- Some slight customization of interface elements
- Encrypted file / binary is too small to have sufficient information in case of trouble
- Crash on copy and after close on windows 8 64Bits
- Have lot of duplication of dll/exe into 32Bits
|